United States v. Gavin
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7850 (T. D. 36141).
1Opinion of the CourtDe Ykies, Judge
The facts are not controverted. The merchandise is trimmings composed of a foundation of silk netting, ornamented with beads and spangles. The netting is of greater value than either the beads or spangles, considered separately, but the beads and spangles, considered together, are more valuable than the netting.
Upon importation the goods were classified for dutiable purposes under that provision of paragraph S58 of the tariff act of 1913 laying duty upon “ trimmings * * * . of whatever yarns, threads, or filaments composed.” Appellees protested, alleging the appropriate classification to be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Loewenthal v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Goat & Sheepskin Import Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- United States v. Hatters' Fur ExchangeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Woolworth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Steinhardt & Bro. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- Edgar Allen Steel Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Eidlitz & Son Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- Chin & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.