Legal Opinion

United States v. Accurate Millinery Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 15, 1955No. 4838PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, Judge

The issue before us concerns the proper classification of imported fur felt hoods which are shapes intended for ultimate use in the manufacture of hats.

The hoods are produced by placing a weighted amount of fur sufficient to make one article in the chamber of an apparatus, from which it is blown into a box-like closed space containing a perforated metal cone, under which there is a suction arrangement in order that air may be drawn through the perforations. As the fur is projected into the box containing the metal cone, which is kept revolving, it settles thereon. During that process hot…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Kalter Mercantile Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  2. Kenyon Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. Blumenthal & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. Steinhardt & Bro. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  5. Vantine v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Accurate Millinery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  2. Accurate Millinery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  3. Armand Schwab Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  4. Embrusa, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  5. N. M. Albert Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API