Hassenpflug v. Jones

UDALL, Chief Justice.,,

The action below was based on two claims for relief. The first on assumpsit and the second for damages resulting from fraud in the transaction. The trial court, sitting without a' jury, made findings of fact and conclusions of law sustaining plaintiffs on both theories. This appeal by defendant, Paula Hassenpflug, from the money judgment for $12,360 together with interest and costs entered against her and in favor of plaintiffs (appellees) David L: Jones and Helen G. Jones, husband and Wife, followed. The parties will -be-, referred to herein either by their names or as…