Haymes v. Rogers
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DE CONCINI, Justice.
In our former opinion, June 12, 1950, 70 Ariz. 257, 219 P.2d 339, we held that as a matter of law there was bad faith shown •on the broker’s part which precluded him from recovery of his commission. In the light of the motion for rehearing and a re-examination of the evidence and instructions we are constrained to change ■our view.
Kelley Rogers, hereinafter called appellee, brought an action against L. F. Haymes, hereinafter referred to as appellant, seeking to recover a real estate commission in the sum of $425.00. The case was tried before a jury which returned a verdict…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Haymes v. RogersArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Dillow v. City of YumaArizona Supreme Court · 1940
- Fornara v. WolpeArizona Supreme Court · 1924
- Leadville Mining Co. v. HemphillArizona Supreme Court · 1915
- Fink v. WilliamsonArizona Supreme Court · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sidney J. Brown v. James R. Coates, Marion E. Coates, and Margaret E. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- HTS, Inc. v. BoleyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2013
- Hurney v. LockeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- City of Phoenix v. HarlanArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Vegodsky v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.