Haymes v. Rogers
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DE CONCINI, Justice.
Kelley Rogers, hereinafter called appellee, brought an action against L. F. Haymes, hereinafter referred to as appellant, seeking to recover a real estate commission in the sum of $425. The case was tried before a jury which returned a verdict in favor of appellee. The said appellant owned a piece of realty which he had listed for sale with the appellee, real estate broker, for the sum of $9,500. The listing card which appellant signed provided that the commission to be paid appellee for selling the property was to be five (5%) per cent of the total selling price. Tom…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Henderson v. VincentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Alford v. CreaghAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
- Harvey v. LindsayMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Mitchell v. GouldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
3Cited by24 opinions
- Sidney J. Brown v. James R. Coates, Marion E. Coates, and Margaret E. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- City of Phoenix v. HarlanArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Vegodsky v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Reese v. HarperUtah Supreme Court · 1958
- City of Phoenix v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.