Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Pryor

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1953No. 5531PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*262LA PRADE, Justice.

Before taking up the issues made by the assignments we will consider a motion to dismiss the appeal that is incorporated in the appellees’ answering brief. The motion is upon the ground that appellants failed to file with their designation of the record on appeal a concise statement of the points on which they intended to rely on appeal, not having brought up the complete record (Transcript of Evidence omitted). Citing Rule 75(d), Sec. 21-1822, A.C.A.1939. This case was submitted for disposition without oral argument. Counsel for appellees with their motion filed an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brutinel v. NygrenArizona Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Light v. Chandler Improvement Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Haymes v. RogersArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Haymes v. RogersArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Reagan v. DoughertyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Oak Grove Investors v. Bell & Gossett Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Albina Engine & Machine Works, Inc. v. AbelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  3. Czarnecki v. CzarneckiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  4. Hassenpflug v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Ornamental and Structural Steel, Inc. v. BBG, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API