Legal Opinion

Matter of Swartz

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1981No. SB-72-2PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Justice:

Respondent-attorney John F. Swartz was charged with unethical conduct in a formal complaint dated March 23, 1979. The Local Administrative Committee found respondent to have violated Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(4) 1 and 7-102(A)(3) 2 and recommended that he be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months. The findings and recommendations of the Committee were approved by the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar of Arizona on a vote of six in favor and one opposed. Respondent objected to the action of the Disciplinary Board, and the matter is now before this…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Delos v. Farmers Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Batson v. StrehlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Morrison v. ActonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  5. In Re McDonnell's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Bar of Nevada v. ClaiborneNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Matter of SwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In Re a Member of State Bar of Arizona RileyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Maurer v. Cerkvenik-Anderson Travel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. Runsvold v. Idaho State BarIdaho Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API