Legal Opinion

Leigh v. Loyd

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1952No. 5504PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANFORD, Justice.

Appellee, plaintiff below, brought this .action to cancel and declare void a note .and realty mortgage held by appellant. Appellee alleged appellant fraudulently procured said note and mortgage from appellee. The lower court renderd judgment in favor of appellee and ordered the note .and mortgage cancelled. Appellant moved .for a new trial and, upon the denial of the motion, now appeals from the judgment and the order denying a new trial.

Appellee, Minnie P. Loyd, was a widow owning certain improved real estate in Tucson, Arizona. The appellant, Joe Leigh, was a real estate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morrison v. ActonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Haymes v. RogersArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Lininger v. Desert LodgeArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Hagan v. CowanArizona Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dimitri Shivkov v. Artex Risk Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Leigh v. SwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State Ex Rel. Willey v. WhitmanArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Rhoads v. Harvey Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. National Housing Industries, Inc. v. E. L. Jones Development Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API