Legal Opinion

Towt v. Pope

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1959No. Civ. 23081PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Defendant was sued by plaintiff, an employee of Yinnell Company, a corporation, for damages arising out of an industrial injury in its steel plant. Pope, vice president of the corporation, was sued individually although Yinnell Company was not joined as a party defendant, plaintiff having exhausted his remedies against it under the compensation provisions of the Labor Code. The matter was heard by a jury and, at the conclusion of plaintiff’s ease, defendant’s motion for a judgment of nonsuit was granted. It is from this judgment plaintiff appeals.

Taking all of the evidence in favor of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Malloy v. FongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Raber v. TuminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Scott v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Sappenfield v. Main Street & Agricultural Park RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Puckhaber v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1901

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. White v. Ultramar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Saala v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Keith Vagle v. Pickands Mather & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  4. Alber v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Ulwelling v. Crown Coach Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API