Legal Opinion

Bergtholdt v. Porter Bros.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1896No. Sac. No. 184PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Placer County. J. E. Prewett, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

Action to recover for services rendered by plaintiff to the defendant, viz., a balance of six hun*684dred and eighty-nine dollars and twelve cents, and, as assignee of F. H. Howell, to recover five hundred and thirty-six dollars and ninety-three cents for services rendered to defendant by said Howell. Plaintiff had judgment for twelve hundred and twenty-six dollars and sixty-five cents, and costs of suit. Defendant appeals from the judgment, and supports its appeal by a bill of exceptions.

Porter Brothers Company, the defendant, was and is a corporation organized and existing under and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. People v. DyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Puget Sound Lumber Co. v. KrugCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Swinnerton v. Argonaut Land & Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Ferguson v. McBeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Michelson v. HamadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Pollack v. LytleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Ferroni v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. PendarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Geary Street, Park & Ocean Railroad v. RolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API