Legal Opinion
Miller v. Lee
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 14, 1944No. Civ. 14471PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (W. J.), J.
In this action, for malicious prosecution, which was tried with a jury, plaintiff obtained a judg ment in the sum of $5,000 against Maurice Lee, Myrtle I. George, Raleigh George and Richard F. George. The motion of Richard F. George for a new trial was granted and- the motion of the other defendants for a new trial ''was denied upon the remittance by plaintiff of the sum of $2,000, which the court had required as a condition of the denial of the motion. Defendants Mjrrtle I. George and Raleigh George have appealed from the judgment. Defendant Lee has not appealed.
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- People v. KilvingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Ball v. RawlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Burke v. WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Miller v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Thomasset v. ThomassetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Lukas v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Aitken v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.