Legal Opinion

Acosta v. Southern California Rapid Transit District

California Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1970No. L.A. 29692PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, Acting C. J.—Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Los Angeles Superior Court entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff Lucile Acosta for general and special damages in the amount of $12,500. Plaintiff sustained injuries in a fall which occurred when the bus on which she was riding stopped suddenly.

We have concluded that the judgment should be affirmed in that the trial court properly refused to exclude evidence of plaintiff’s medical expenses. In addition, the court properly refused to permit defendant, without a proper foundation, to inquire before the jury as to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. People v. MosherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Caminetti v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Lopez v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Bardessono v. MichelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Hrnjak v. Graymar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1971

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API