Puget Sound Lumber Co. v. Krug
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Napa County granting a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vancltee, C.
— The defendants are husband and wife. This action was brought to recover from the wife the value of lumber alleged tb have been purchased by her from the plaintiff through the agency of her husband.
The case was tried by a jury. Verdict and judgment for $5,044.98. On motion of defendants, a new Uml was *239granted, and this appeal is from the order granting a new trial.
The grounds upon which the new trial was asked were: 1. Insufficiency of evidence; 2. Errors of law; and 3. That the verdict was against law. It appears, however, from the opinion of the lower court, brought up with the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McLaren v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Fry's v. Lexington & Big Sandy RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
- Arnold v. SpurrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Thomas v. MoodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Westgate v. MunroeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Bergtholdt v. Porter Bros.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Geary Street, Park & Ocean Railroad v. RolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Schader v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Lovetro v. SteersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Ford v. Lou Kum ShuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.