Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co., P.L.L.P.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court judgment dismissing its second lawsuit against respondent on res judicata grounds, arguing that the second lawsuit was not precluded because there is no final judgment on the merits in the first lawsuit, the first and second lawsuits involve different causes of action, and they were deprived of a full and fair opportunity to litigate the matter. Respondent argues that the second lawsuit is barred by application of res judicata and the prohibition against claim splitting. Because we conclude that there has not been a final judgment…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hauser v. MealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Hauschildt v. BeckinghamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Tereault v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Hamilton v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Butts v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan SocietyDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2012
- Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006