Legal Opinion
State v. Joseph
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 6, 2001No. C2-00-1364PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
This appeal by Barbara and James Joseph (collectively, the Josephs), the State of Minnesota, and William Henry is from a decision of the court of appeals reversing an order of the Chisago County District Court in a garnishment proceeding against Church Mutual Insurance Company (Church Mutual). In that proceeding, the district court held that Church Mutual was estopped by the six-year statute of limitations and collateral estoppel from denying insurance coverage to the Josephs. The court of appeals reversed, holding that neither the statute of limitations nor collateral…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sil-Flo, Inc. v. SFHC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Hauser v. MealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Ossman v. Diana Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Lavera Granetha Ashanti v. City of Golden ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Andrew Robinson International, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Hauschildt v. BeckinghamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Scott H. Lansing v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.