Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 2000No. S069596PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

In this case we determine primarily whether a special statute limitations for injury or illness caused by exposure to asbestos (Code Civ. Proc., § 340.2) bars an action for a certain asbestos-related disease brought by a worker who retired before suffering a disability as defined by the statute. The Court of Appeal held the action was barred because the plaintiff had brought an earlier action against the same defendant for a different disease arising from the same asbestos exposure. As will appear, we conclude that the second action is not time-barred and hence the judgment of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Ferraro v. Southern California Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Pustejovsky v. Rapid-American Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. McCann v. Foster Wheeler LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Daley v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Ebony Bridewell-Sledge v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API