State v. Martin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1DissentMeyer, Justice
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that Lennell Martin waived *627his right to be present for some jury communications, and its affirmance of Martin’s conviction. I would hold that the facts and law do not support a determination that Martin knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily relinquished his right to be present, and that the failure of the trial court to make a record of communications with the deliberating jury should result in reversal and remand for a new trial.
The Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provide the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.