Legal Opinion

Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 31, 2007No. A05-340, A05-1952Published

1Opinion of the Court

732 N.W.2d 209 (2007)

BROWN-WILBERT, INC., et al., Appellants (A05-340), Respondents (A05-1952),

v.

COPELAND BUHL & CO., P.L.L.P., et al., Respondents (A05-340), Appellants (A05-1952).

Nos. A05-340, A05-1952.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

May 31, 2007.

Kay Nord Hunt, Lommen, Nelson, Cole & Stageberg, P.A.; George E. Antrim, III, George E. Antrim, III, PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellants (A05-340), Respondents (A05-1952).

Peter A. Koller, Thomas J. Shroyer, Moss & Barnett, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for Respondents (A05-340), Appellants (A05-1952).

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Deposit Bank v. FrankfortSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Hauser v. MealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API