Legal Opinion
Tereault v. Palmer
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 13, 1987No. C1-87-936PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
In 1981, appellants (the Tereaults) sued respondents (the Palmers, Burnet Realty, and Quality Homes) for breach of express and implied warranty, for the sale of defective property, and for misrepresentation in the sale of a home. The district court entered summary judgment for Quality Homes on the breach of implied warranty claim, finding no such warranty could exist because the Tereaults were not in privity with Quality Homes. We affirm.
FACTS
The facts in this case are not in dispute. In 1972, Quality Homes sold a home in their Shoreview development to the Warrens. In…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Redarowicz v. OhlendorfIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Hoff v. KemptonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Brown v. FowlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Robertson Lumber Co. v. Stephen Farmers Cooperative Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Flynn v. American Home Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Speight v. Walters Development Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2008
- Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage LitigationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Glorvigen v. Cirrus Design Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.