Legal Opinion
Hauser v. Mealey
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 17, 1978No. 47192PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING C. IVERSON, Justice. *
This appeal involves an action for reformation of deeds conveying real property in Hardin County, Iowa, for damages for breach of contract for failure to restore real estate owned prior to coverture, and for damages based upon the alleged fraudulent conduct of defendant.
The facts and procedural history of this case are somewhat involved and confusing, and a thorough understanding of them is required before a proper determination of this case can be made. 1
Defendant, William Mealey, married Cleo Hauser (Cleo Mealey) on June 3, 1961, in Walker, Minnesota. At the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Loomis v. LoomisNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Youngstown Mines Corp. v. ProutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- William Weisman Holding Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Shimp Ex Rel. Shimp v. SederstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Gollner v. CramSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Joel Charchenko v. City of StillwaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Kaiser v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Hauschildt v. BeckinghamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.