In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Kumley
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) alleged that the accused, an inactive member of the Bar, violated two Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rules — DR 1-102(A)(2) and DR 1-102(A)(3)— and one statute — ORS 9.160 — by describing himself as an “attorney” in forms that he submitted to two state agencies in connection with his candidacy for a seat in the state legislature. A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board determined that the accused had committed all three charged violations and suspended him from the practice of law for 12 months. Because of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DavenportOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re StarrOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re ClaussenOregon Supreme Court · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FitzhenryOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- In re HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 2020
- In Re CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.