Legal Opinion

Braddy v. Zych

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1985No. Nos. 49152, 49264PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

These appeals involve the validity of two ordinances alleged to have been enacted by the Board of Aldermen of the City of St. Louis. The trial court by summary judgment in separate cases, upheld the validity of the ordinance in Number 49152 and held invalid the ordinance in 49264. The ordinances are unrelated and were enacted at different times. Each appeal presents a totally different legal issue. For reasons not clearly apparent we consolidated the appeals.

Plaintiff Braddy is the Register of the City of St. Louis whose obligation it is to file, number, and publish…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Board of CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  2. City of Nevada v. SlemmonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  3. City of Alamo Heights v. GeretyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. Bonsack & Pearce, Inc. v. School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. State Ex Rel. Peterson v. HoppeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Meador-Brady Management Corp. v. Texas Motor Vehicle CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Merry v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  3. Palmer v. Municipality of Anchorage, Police & Fire Retirement BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State ex rel. Brown v. City of O'FallonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Smith v. Taney Cnty.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API