Legal Opinion

Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Board of Commissioners

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1973No. Civ. 8924PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOGEL, Judge.

The only question before us is the construction of Section 40-11-02, North Dakota Century Code (set forth in full, infra), as applied to- the peculiar facts presented by this case. Otherwise stated, we must decide whether Ordinance No. 1444 of the City of Fargo was passed. The controversy arises because Section 40-11-02 requires for the passage of a city ordinance that “. . .a majority of all of the members of the governing body must concur in the passage . . .” and upon the first reading of the ordinance two of the five members of the commission voted “yea,” two were absent, and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Rushville Gas Co. v. City of RushvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Pimental v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Cascaden v. City of WaterlooSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  4. O'Neil v. TylerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  5. State ex rel. Young v. YatesMontana Supreme Court · 1897

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Littlefield v. City of AftonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  2. Application of Bank of RhameNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Rock v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Hager v. Devils Lake Public School DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Jensen v. TURNER COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API