Legal Opinion
Smith v. Taney Cnty.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 8, 2018No. SD 34659PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJeffrey W. Bates, P.J.
The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Taney County (the County) and against Greg and Stephanie Smith (the Smiths) in their action to declare a "nightly rental" zoning ordinance invalid. Because the County failed to make a prima facie showing that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, we reverse *748and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Factual and Procedural Background
In 2012, the Taney County prosecutor filed class A misdemeanor criminal charges against the Smiths, alleging that they had violated the Taney County Development Guidance Code (Code)…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Dhyne v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- Hargis v. JLB Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- Nicolai v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
- Sarah Tupper, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. City of St. Louis, Appellants/Cross-Respondents.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lehmann v. Fox C-6 Sch. Dist.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- MICHAEL C. LAWS, JR., and MALINDA A. SALINGER v. J. CHRISTOPHER ALLEN, Personal Representative, and SUBSTITUTED PARTIES MOREAU, Defendants-RespondentsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
- Stacy A. Albright v. Union Electric CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024