Palmer v. Municipality of Anchorage, Police & Fire Retirement Board
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Anchorage Police and Fire Retirement Board denied Geoffrey Palmer occupational disability benefits for heart disease that worsened during his twelve-year tenure as a police officer for the Municipality of Anchorage. Palmer appealed, and the superior court affirmed. Because a board member’s motion to award Palmer benefits did not receive the requisite five votes, we hold that the board correctly rejected Palmer’s claim, even though four board members — a majority of the seven deciding his case— voted for the motion.
We also affirm the board’s decision…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Miller v. ITT Arctic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Rose v. Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP v. State, Department of AdministrationAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Gunter v. Kathy-O-EstatesAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Nunley v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement DivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Nicolos v. North Slope BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- SOP, Inc. v. State, Dept. of Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Outdoor RecreationAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.