Legal Opinion

City of Alamo Heights v. Gerety

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 27, 1954No. 12624PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

This suit concerns the statutory construction of certain words in Article lOlle, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.Stats. Mr. and Mrs. B. S. Gerety undertook to rezone certain property they own in the City of Alamo Heights. Their application was denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission of that City and they appealed to the City Council. Alamo Heights operates under the general laws of the State of Texas and its council consists of five aldermen. To effect their desired rezoning it was incumbent upon appellees to obtain “the favorable vote of three-fourths of all the members of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Meixell v. Hellertown Borough CouncilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Mills v. GleasonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Bowman v. Gum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Wood v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Board of CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Johnson v. the City of Dublin, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2001
  3. City of Northlake v. East Justin Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Aurentz v. Planning Board of Little Egg HarborNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  5. Hawaii Electric Light Co. v. Department of Land & Natural ResourcesHawaii Supreme Court · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API