Legal Opinion

Meador-Brady Management Corp. v. Texas Motor Vehicle Commission

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1993No. D-2885PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HECHT, Justice.

The Texas Motor Vehicle Commission has six members, a majority of whom constitute a quorum. Texas Motor Vehicle Commission Code, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 4413(36), §§ 2.02, 2.08(a) (Vernon Supp.1993). The Commission is authorized to take final action upon a “majority vote of a quorum of the Commissioners”. Id. § 3.08(g). The principal issue in this case is whether the Commission can reach a final decision on a vote of 2-1, with one commissioner abstaining. The court of appeals answered this question in the affirmative. 833 S.W.2d 683. We disagree.

Gulf Coast Sports,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rushville Gas Co. v. City of RushvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Board of CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Commercial Life Insurance Co. v. Texas State Board of InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State ex rel. Rea v. EtheridgeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  5. City of Haven v. GreggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Meier Infiniti Co. v. Motor Vehicle Board, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
  2. Frank v. Liberty Insurance Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  3. Morales v. Employers Casualty Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
  4. Star Houston, Inc. v. Texas Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  5. HCA Healthcare Corp. v. Texas Department of Insurance, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API