Manuel v. Flynn
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Napa County, and from an order denying a new trial. A. G. Burnett, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
Action to quiet title and for damages claimed to have been suffered by plaintiff through certain alleged tortious acts of defendant.
The complaint alleges that the plaintiff, “ever since the 23d day of February, 1884, has been the owner, in possession of and entitled to the possession of certain real property, situate within the County of Napa, State of California, ’ ’ and of which a description is particularly set out. The title in plaintiff to the land as described in the complaint is not questioned, but the controversy arises over the line dividing the lands of the parties and involves a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Herrlich v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Melde v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- San Diego Savings Bank v. GoodsellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Von Glahn v. BrennanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Skinner v. HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Barrett-Hicks Co. v. GlasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Nason v. FeldhusenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Zany v. Rawhide Gold Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Clark v. McCainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Fisher v. Western Fuse & Explosives Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.