San Diego Savings Bank v. Goodsell
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Forclosure. The complaint sets forth the ordinary action to foreclose a mortgage executed by Edward L. Goodsell and his wife, Kate Goodsell, to secure their promissory note for fifteen thousand dollars. The appeal is by Mrs. Goodsell and by defendants Sarah Killman and Maggie K. Littlefield, from the judgment in favor of plaintiff, on the judgment-roll, and upon three bills of exceptions, namely:—
1. Bill of exceptions of defendant Kate Goodsell and defendant People’s Trust Company, taken at the hearing of motion for an order vacating the order for publication of summons, made July…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ricketson v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Herrlich v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Reinhart v. LugoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Hanson v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- In re LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Catlett v. Chestnut, as Exr.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Matter of DanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Ridge v. Boulder Creek Union Junior-Senior High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Verges v. Lomas & Nettleton Financial Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1982
- Briggs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.