Barrett-Hicks Co. v. Glas
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Further facts are stated in the previous decisions therein referred to.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Foreclosure of mechanics ’ and material-men’s liens. The detailed facts will be found stated in the consolidated action under this title in 97 Pac. 423 and 99 Pac. 857. Certain of the causes of action were first disposed of in this court which were later taken to the supreme court by transfer, where the conclusions of this court were concurred in. The present appeal, which is on a separate transcript, was taken by plaintiff: First, from that part of the judgment entered in the first cause of action set out in the complaint, adjudging that plaintiffs are not entitled to the lien claimed, to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bragg v. ShainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- County of Glenn v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Tuohy v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Burnett v. GlasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Judah v. ZimmermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Simpson v. BergmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Hubbard v. JurianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- First Congregational Church of Christ v. LowreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Barrett-Hicks Co. v. GlasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Dunne Investment Co. v. Empire State Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.