Skinner v. Horn
California Supreme Court
SUGGESTION of Respondent for diminution of record upon appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the County of Riverside granting a new trial. J. S. Noyes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
The superior court having granted a motion for a new trial as to defendant B. H. Pendleton, the plaintiff appealed from such order, and has filed in this court a transcript on appeal containing the judgment-roll, the settled statement used on the motion for a new trial, a copy of the order granting a new trial, and of the notice of appeal.
Respondent, Pendleton, has suggested to this court that the transcript is defective in that it does not contain certain specified affidavits which, it is alleged in the affidavit filed herein on his behalf, were read, used, and considered by the trial court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Herrlich v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Melde v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Nash v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Von Glahn v. BrennanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Larkin v. LarkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Matter of DanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Gray v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Power v. FairbanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- In Re Estate of DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Schroeder v. MauzyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.