Legal Opinion

Von Glahn v. Brennan

California Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1889No. 12152PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Hayne, C.

Ejectment for a lot 40 by 69i feet, on the southwest corner of Filbert and Steiner streets, in the city of San Francisco; verdict and judgment for plaintiff; defendants appeal.

The defendants (who were husband and wife) had no paper title, but relied on adverse possession. The defendant, J. 0. Brennan, says that one Hagan gave him possession in 1872, and told him to hold the lot for one *262Godfrin (known as French Charlie) until his, Godfrin’s, return; that no one had any right to it except' Godfrin, and that “he did n’t think the Frenchman would come back to claim it.” Defendant Brennan…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Simpson v. ApplegateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Sunset Tel. and Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Oberlander v. Fixen & Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Melde v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Higginbotham v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1900
  5. San Diego Savings Bank v. GoodsellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API