Fisher v. Western Fuse & Explosives Co.
California Court of Appeal
MOTIONS to dismiss appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from order denying a new trial, dismissing proceedings for settlement of a bill of exceptions, and dismissing the motion for a new trial. F. B. Ogden, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
There are three different motions in this ease, each taking a separate number. Number 669 is a motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment on the ground that no transcript has been filed in time. The transcript, however, was filed agreeably to stipulation, which is a sufficient answer to the first motion. The second motion, number 671, is a motion to dismiss defendant’s appeal, taken July 29, 1907, from the order of the superior court, made May 31, 1907, denying appellant’s motion for a new trial made by it under the act of March 23, 1907 (Stats. 1907, p. 998), which second motion is, by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Melde v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- San Diego Savings Bank v. GoodsellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Johnson v. GebhauerIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Linott v. RowlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Skinner v. HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fernandez v. Western Fuse & Explosives Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- Cook v. Suburban Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
- Fisher v. Western Fuse & Explosives Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Fisher v. Western Fuse & Explosives Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Fisher v. Western Fuse Etc. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.