Nason v. Feldhusen
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Sau Joaquin County changing place of trial. C. W. Norton, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the superior court of San Joaquin County, in which court the action was commenced, changing the place of trial to the county of Sacramento.
It is the contention of appellants that “the purpose of the action is to bring about the rescission of a contract and secure the cancellation of a note and deed of trust given by plaintiffs, appellants, to Henry Feldhusen and A. M. Mull az trustees for California Guaranty Life and Accident Insurance Company. The real estate involved is situated in the county of San Joaquin. Appellants have at all times resided in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Herrlich v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Melde v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- LeBreton v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Von Glahn v. BrennanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brown v. Happy Valley Fruit Growers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. Royal Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Turlock Theatre Co. v. LawsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Postin v. GriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Sequoia Pine Mills, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.