Legal Opinion

State v. Camacho-Alvarez

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 7, 2009No. C062071CR; A134796PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of, among other crimes, first-degree robbery, ORS 164.415, and third-degree robbery, ORS 164.395, after a nonunanimous jury returned guilty verdicts. On appeal, he argues that the court erred in failing to merge the two robbery convictions into a single first-degree robbery conviction. He also assigns error to the court’s instruction to the jury that it could return a less than unanimous guilty verdict. Neither claim of error was preserved below.

We reject the contention that the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution require jury unanimity.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State v. FultsOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. RyderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. State v. UngerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. LedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API