State v. Camacho-Alvarez
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Defendant was convicted of, among other crimes, first-degree robbery, ORS 164.415, and third-degree robbery, ORS 164.395, after a nonunanimous jury returned guilty verdicts. On appeal, he argues that the court erred in failing to merge the two robbery convictions into a single first-degree robbery conviction. He also assigns error to the court’s instruction to the jury that it could return a less than unanimous guilty verdict. Neither claim of error was preserved below.
We reject the contention that the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution require jury unanimity.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. FultsOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. RyderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. UngerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. LedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.