Gurski v. Rosenblum and Filan, LLC
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether a client may assign a legal malpractice claim or the proceeds from such a claim to the client’s adversary in the underlying litigation. The defendants, the law firm of Rosenblum and Filan, LLC, and one of its principals, James Rosenblum (law firm), appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered in accordance with a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Walter Gurski. We conclude that an assignment of a legal malpractice claim or the proceeds from such a claim to an adversary in the same litigation that gave rise to the…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Faulkner v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Dodd v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Picadilly, Inc. v. RaikosIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Hedlund Manufacturing Co. v. Weiser, Stapler & SpivakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Lannan Found. v. GingoldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Stearns & Wheeler, LLC v. Kowalsky Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Brandon Apparel Group v. Kirkland and EllisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Villanueva v. First American Title InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- Revolutionary Concepts, Inc. v. Clements Walker PLLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.