Legal Opinion
State v. Jury
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 20, 2002No. 93CR875; A83517PublishedCited by 137 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
Defendant appeals his convictions for possession of a controlled substance, delivery of a controlled substance, and frequenting a place where controlled substances are used. ORS 475.992; ORS 167.222. At trial, the court admitted evidence that the police had obtained through the use of a body wire that they had placed on an informant. The police did not obtain a court order authorizing them to use the body wire. Defendant contends that the trial court’s admission of that evidence was error under State v. Fleetwood, 331 Or 511, 16 P3d 503 (2000), and State v. Cleveland, 331 Or 531, 16 P3d 514…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. WoolardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- J. Arlie Bryant, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by137 opinions
- State v. VanornumOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. CoverstoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. GornickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. LovernCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.