Legal Opinion

City of San Diego v. Andrews

California Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1924No. Docket No. S.F. 11219PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The petitioner seeks a writ of mandate to compel the respondent, as judge of the superior court in and for the county of San Diego, to proceed with a hearing and determination of a demurrer to an amended answer and amended cross-complaint in an action pending in said court. The matter is submitted on a general demurrer to the petition.

On the fifth day of March, 1923, the petitioner commenced an action in the superior court of San Diego County entitled: “The City of.San Diego, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Cuyamaca Water Company, a Corporation, The Cuyamaca Water Company, a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Boskowitz v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People Ex Rel. Fogg v. Perris Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. McNeil v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Miller v. Mun. Court of L. A.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. City of Valdosta v. SingletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Times-Mirror Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. City of San Diego v. Cuyamaca Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Price v. Atchison, T. & SF Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API