City of San Diego v. Cuyamaca Water Co.
California Supreme Court
Crouch & Sanders, Hugh A. Sanders, Sweet, Sterns & Forward, Philip Storer Thacher, E. V. Winnek, Sterns, Luce & Forward, O ’Melveny, Tuller & Myers, W. A. Sloane and Sloane & Sloane for Defendants, Interveners and Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, J.—
A rehearing was granted herein after the decision of this cause by the court in bank in order that an even more full and careful consideration might be given to the important questions involved in this appeal. Upon such consideration we have concluded to reaffirm the conclusions arrived at in our former decision, and to adopt the language of such decision, with such emendations as may be required in view of the further light which has been shed upon the subject by former and further counsel for the respective parties, as ivell as by the briefs of amici curiae filed herein.
This…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Hart v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Botiller v. DominguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. ShirokowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.