Legal Opinion

Price v. Atchison, T. & SF Railway Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1954No. L. A. No. 22934PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

42 Cal.2d 577 (1954)

ROY D. PRICE, Appellant,

v.

THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY (a Corporation), Respondent.

L. A. No. 22934.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Mar. 31, 1954.

Hildebrand, Bills & McLeod and D. W. Brobst for Appellant.

Robert W. Walker, Frederic A. Jacobus and J. H. Cummins for Respondent.

SCHAUER, J.

This case presents the question of the availability in California of the doctrine of forum non conveniens as a ground for refusal by a court to exercise jurisdiction over a cause of action which arose outside the state's boundaries. We have concluded that upon a…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Canada Malting Co. v. Paterson Steamships, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Owens Corning v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Stangvik v. Shiley Inc.California Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Archibald v. Cinerama HotelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Thomson v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Goodwine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API