People Ex Rel. Fogg v. Perris Irrigation District
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from, a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County and from an order denying a new trial. J. S. Noyes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison,j.
—The present action was brought against the defendant by the attorney-general, under section 803 of the Code of Civil Procedure, charging it with the usurpation and unlawful exercise of the powers of a legally organized irrigation district, and asking a judgment declaring that the proceedings under which it claimed to have been organized were illegal and void, and that its powers and franchise be forfeited. An answer denying the allegations of the complaint was filed by the defendant, and thereafter, with the permission of the court, certain persons claiming an interest in the controversy, by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. Linda Vista Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Joyce v. McAvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Eitel v. FooteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Adams v. LambardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Hodgdon v. S. Pac. R.R Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by26 opinions
- Redevelopment Agency v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- The Title & Document Restoration Co. v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Estate of RadovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.