McNeil v. Morgan
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Sullivan & Sullivan, Theo. J. Roche, and Cassin & Lucas, for Appellant
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
This is an appeal by James MeNeil, intervener, from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Louise B. MeNeil, and from an order denying the motion of said intervener for a new trial.
Plaintiff, Louise B. MeNeil, brought suit against Frank McLaughlin as administrator of the estate of James McNeil, deceased, seeking a judgment against the estate of said deceased quieting her asserted title to certain real property in the city of Santa Cruz. On the day after it was filed the defendant answered and pursuant to a stipulation of the parties the cause was transferred to the county of Santa Clara and to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Curtis v. SutterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Donahue v. MeisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Angus v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Newman v. DuaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. BrophyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Wright v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Ruiz v. Santa Barbara Gas & Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Thomson v. ThomsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- In Re Proceeding to Validate Sutter-Butte By-Pass Assessment Number SixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.