Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for Writ of Prohibition directed against the Superior Court of Tulare County and the judge thereof to prevent further proceedings in a pending action. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
—This is a proceeding in prohibition begun in this court to prevent further proceedings in an action pending before Judge Wallace in the superior court of Tulare County wherein Tulare Irrigation District and many others, corporations and individuals, are plaintiffs and LindsayStrathmore Irrigation District is defendant.
The ground of this proceeding, stated generally, is that by reason of the ownership by Judge Wallace of a certain lot of land 85 feet by 123 feet in size situated in the city of Visalia, the action is one “in which he is interested” and consequently one in which, under the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Oakley v. . AspinwallNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Taylor v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Pearce v. AtwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
- People v. WebbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Learned v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Bowles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Turlock Irrigation Dist. v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Betz v. PankowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.