Legal Opinion

Miller v. Mun. Court of L. A.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1943No. S. F. 16905PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

An alternative writ of mandate issued upon the petitions of Bradstreet Miller, Jr., and Prentiss M. Brown, Administrator of the Office of Price Administration, as intervener, commanding the small claims court, a division of the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles, to show cause why it should not hear and determine a consumer action authorized by the federal Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 (56 Stats. 23; 50 U.S.C.A.,App., secs. 901-946). In response to the writ, the court, answering in its name and that of the judge who made the order complained of, asserts that it has no…

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. BirksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. McCarroll v. Los Angeles County District Council of CarpentersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API