Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F.
California Supreme Court
PETITION for Writ of Mandate to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the superior court and Frank J. Murasky, as judge thereof, to hear and consider a motion of the petitioners duly presented to said court, to modify, and in part vacate, a previous order of the court in the matter of the estate of Patrick H. Cahill, deceased,- setting apart a homestead to the widow of the deceased out of the property of the estate.
The motion for the modification was made and presented within six months after the order setting apart the homestead When the motion was presented to the superior court the widow appeared thereto and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Merced Mining Co. v. FremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Barnes v. GlideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People Ex Rel. Gas-Light Co. v. . Common CouncilNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Crocker v. ConreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Temple v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.