Legal Opinion
Kendrick v. Barrow
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 1, 1938No. Civ. 11870PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
The petitioner, Minnie W. Barrow, widow of Thomas M. Barrow, deceased, filed in the probate court a petition for a family allowance and for cancellation of a property settlement agreement made by petitioner and Thomas M. Barrow during his lifetime. The petition was opposed by the executor of the will of Thomas M. Barrow and by Frank E. Barrow, a son by a previous marriage. The executor and the son have appealed from the orders granting the petition.
In the property settlement agreement petitioner waived various rights, among them the right to a family allowance. The trial court found that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Locke Paddon v. Locke PaddonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Green v. DuvergeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Paine v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Williams v. HasshagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Wilson v. Rigali & VeselichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Boyd v. BevilacquaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Butler v. NeppleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- In Re Marriage of Garrity and BishtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Longway v. NewberyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Santoro v. CarboneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.