Legal Opinion

Locke Paddon v. Locke Paddon

California Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1924No. S. F. No. 10921PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

Defendant has appealed from an order granting to the plaintiff temporary alimony, counsel fees, and costs in an action for divorce. He has also made a motion for diminution of the record. A motion to dismiss the appeal has been made by the plaintiff, which will first be considered.

Upon' the filing of the complaint an order was issued requiring the appellant to show cause on November 3, 1922, if any he had, why he should not be required to pay to the respondent reasonable costs and counsel fees for the maintenance and prosecution of the action and alimony pendente lite. A hearing was had on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Gay v. GayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Green v. DuvergeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Biaggi v. RamontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Loveren v. LoverenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Helene Marceau Sidebotham v. W. L. Robison, Administrator of the Estate of Robert Sidebotham, Deceased, and Robert Sidebotham and James SidebothamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  2. Baxter v. BaxterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Estate of McNuttCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Sweeley v. SweeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Lake v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API