Boyd v. Bevilacqua
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, P. J.
Defendants 1 and cross-complainants 2 appeal from an adverse judgment awarding plaintiffs compensatory and punitive damages against defendants and denying cross-complainants the Bevilacquas all recovery on their cross-complaint. As to the complaint, the judgment was entered on a jury verdict awarding plaintiffs compensatory damages in the sum of $65,750 and punitive damages in the sum of $34,250, subsequently ordered reduced to $50,000 compensatory and $20,000 punitive damages, pursuant to a remission filed by plaintiffs as a condition for the denial of defendants’ motion for a new trial. 3…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Rodriguez v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Shanghai Automation Instrument Co., Ltd. v. KueiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
- April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Diane MILLER and Pamela Lewis, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FAIRCHILD INDUSTRIES, INC., a Maryland Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Bustamante v. Intuit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Twomey v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.