Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Garrity and Bishton

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1986No. B002744PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON,

J.—This is an appeal from a further judgment on bifurcated

issues following entry of an interlocutory judgment of dissolution of marriage. The appellant raises numerous issues in challenging the trial court’s determinations concerning the proper division of property between the parties.

Statement of Facts and Proceedings Below

The appellant, Bishton, and the respondent, Garrity, met in February 1979. Both are lawyers. They had each been previously married. Bishton had three children from his prior marriage while Garrity had four children.

In April or May 1979, Bishton and Garrity…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. In Re Marriage of LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. In Re Marriage of FonsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. People v. Casa Blanca Convalescent Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. United States v. Walter D. Brodie, United States of America v. Nancy A. BrodieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Pannu v. Land Rover North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. In Re Marriage of NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. In Re the Marriage of WeaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API