Butler v. Nepple
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
Plaintiff as assignee of one Turnbull brought this action to recover delay rentals claimed to be due under paragraph 3 of an assignment of an oil and gas lease. The case was tried by the court without a jury. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff in the sum of $20,352 (being six months’ rental at $3,000 per month, plus interest). Meanwhile levy had been made on two bank accounts, purportedly belonging to defendant. After the entry of judgment, • a third party claim was made to one of the bank accounts on the premise that the funds belonged to certain limited partnerships of which defendant…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Nissho-Iwai Co., Ltd. v. Occidental Crude Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Carolina Power & Light Co. v. UranexDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1977
- Brinkmann v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- LeBar v. HaynieWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.