Legal Opinion

Butler v. Nepple

California Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1960No. L. A. 25356PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

Plaintiff as assignee of one Turnbull brought this action to recover delay rentals claimed to be due under paragraph 3 of an assignment of an oil and gas lease. The case was tried by the court without a jury. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff in the sum of $20,352 (being six months’ rental at $3,000 per month, plus interest). Meanwhile levy had been made on two bank accounts, purportedly belonging to defendant. After the entry of judgment, • a third party claim was made to one of the bank accounts on the premise that the funds belonged to certain limited partnerships of which defendant…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Nissho-Iwai Co., Ltd. v. Occidental Crude Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  3. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. UranexDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1977
  4. Brinkmann v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. LeBar v. HaynieWyoming Supreme Court · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API